Training

All effective compliance programs contain an element for training. Don’t forget to train your new people that are involved in the export process. DL Exports will be hosting a series of trainings this fall, and winter. Please note that we are adding classes in beautiful Newport RI.

Visit: http://www.dlexports.com/training.

Security

Encrypt any removable devices, (i.e.: Flashdrives) if you have ITAR data. Please see the following article from IT Security Blog:

The IT Security Blog Roundup: http://roundup.scmagazineblogs.com/2007/05/02/youre-a-good-man-glen-frausto/

You’re a good man, Glen Frausto

Author: Frank Washkuch

There’s a truck driver in Texas with a full tank of gas and a clear conscience.

According to a report in the Hartford Courant, which came to the attention of SCMagazineBlogs.com via this write up by mordaxus on the Emergent Chaos blog, a Lockheed Martin employee dropped a USB flash drive at a gas station. That pack-of-gum-sized drive contained details on the Joint Strike Fighter aircraft, the nation’s most expensive weapons program.

According to a Bloomberg news story, Glen Frausto took the device home for a 20 minute investigation and turned it over to authorities.

The U.S. Air Force completed its investigation last month, according to authorities.

Boston Globe article on same subject: http://www.boston.com/business/technology/articles/2007/04/19/fbi_checking_data_lost_by_lockheed/.

AES: Compliance Reviews

The Census Bureau has completed its “pretest” of certain companies in the mid-Atlantic/DC area under its new compliance review program, and has issued a “best practices” manual to guide exporters. Census is now expanding its review program nationwide, focusing on companies with poor compliance records and issues with the Automated Export System (AES). Once reviewed, a company will be given 90 days to comply with the agency’s recommendations or lose their AES reporting privileges and be referred for enforcement.

 

Deemed Exports Proposed Ruling

The Commerce Department is considering expansion of the deemed export rule, under which a release of technology to a foreign national within the U.S. is deemed to be an exportation to such foreign national's home country. On March 28, 2005, a notice of proposed rule making was published and the comment period was extended to June 27, 2005. The ruling has not yet been established. The Commerce Department has concluded that existing policies could enable foreign nationals from countries and entities of concern to access otherwise controlled technology. The proposed rule extends the definition of "use" under the deemed export rule and requires a U.S. person to use a foreign national's country of birth as a criterion for the deemed export rule. Thus, a U.S. person will apply for a deemed export license for employees or visitors who are foreign nationals and have access to dual-use controlled technology if they were born in a country where the technology transfer in question would require an export license, regardless of the foreign national's citizenship or residence.

BIS has held a number Technical Advisory Committee (TAC) meetings as this change could have major impact with industry and universities, especially in the area of university research. Of special concerns are the guidelines set forth on usage of controlled technology by students. Under the ruling, usage of some technology, i.e.: large scale computers, would become off limits to some students depending upon their nationality.

BIS final rule for the People's Republic of China

BIS published the final rule that contains revisions and clarifications of export and reexport controls for the People's Republic of China pertaining to 31 categories of low level foreign-policy controlled items that are exported for military end-use.Exporters must review these 31 ECCNs and either obtain an end-use statement that the items will not be used for military use combined with due diligence research, or will need to obtain an export license. The BIS plans to create a preferred list of Chinese companies that are purely commercial that exporters and check and then export these items under a VEU authorization.

  • The rule creates a validated end-use (VEU) program which authorizes the export and export of eligible items for commercial use only.
  • The rule pertains only to foreign-policy controlled items and not EAR99 items.
  • Bureau of Industry and Security's Deputy Assistant Secretary Matt Borman will respond to questions and these are attached. China Rule Qs and As

Encryption

Exporters are reminded that encryption software and hardware are required to submit their products for commodity classification. Products that are classified 5A002 or 5D002 must have export reported bi-annually to BIS and NSA. January to June sales must be reported by August 1st, July to December sales must be reported by February first in electronic format (Recommended file formats for electronic submission include spreadsheets, tabular text or structured text) by email to BIS at crypt@bis.doc.gov and to the ENC Encryption Request Coordinator at enc@nsa.gov. If you have not submitted your product for classification, DL Exports can provide this service to you. Please call or write us.

Changes in Harmonized and Schedule B Codes for 2007

On December 27, 2006, President George W. Bush signed Presidential Proclamation 8097 implementing the 2007 changes to the Harmonized Tariff Schedule of the United States (HTSUS), and it was published in the Federal Register on January 4, 2007. (http://a257.g.akamaitech.net/7/257/2422/01jan20071800/edocket.access.gpo.gov/2007/pdf/07-00004.pdf)

The new tariffs went into effect on February 3, 2007, U.S. Customs and Border Protection (CBP) has stated it will give importers an additional 15-day grace period before enforcing the new 10-digit tariff classifications as well as other rules for certain goods. The grace period would allow importers to refile entries rejected due to classification errors resulting from changes mandated by the World Customs Organization (WCO).

The International Trade Commission (ITC) has posted, at the full 10-digit level, the U.S. Harmonized Tariff Schedule changes on its Web site, located at http://www.usitc.gov/tata/hts/bychapter/index.htm. The WCO changes affect 83 HTS chapters and more than 240 headings of the HTSUS, as well as over 1,600 eight-digit HTSUS classifications.

DDTC, D-Trade, and SNAP-R

Directorate of Defense Trade Controls has a new web address, http://pmddtc.state.gov. Users of D-Trade are advised to go onto the D-Trade website and always use the latest viewer and forms. D-Trade will not accept old form submissions.

BIS has implemented Simplified Network Application Process Redesign (SNAP-R) includes enhanced security, the ability to attach supporting documentation electronically, user access rights, and the ability for BIS Licensing Officers to view work items and supporting documents electronically. SNAP has been retired as of December 2006, and documents from SNAP have been transferred to SNAP-R.

Users of D-Trade are advised to go onto the D-Trade website.

Additional Restrictions on North Korea

In accordance with recent United Nations (UN) Security Council resolutions and the foreign policy interests of the United States, the United States Government is imposing restrictions on exports and reexports of luxury goods to the Democratic People's Republic of Korea (North Korea), and is continuing to restrict exports and reexports of nuclear or missile-related items and other items included on the Commerce Control List (CCL). To this end, the Bureau of Industry and Security (BIS) is amending the Export Administration Regulations (EAR) to impose license requirements for the export and reexport of virtually all items subject to the EAR to North Korea, except food and medicines not listed on the CCL.

BIS will generally deny applications to export and reexport luxury goods, e.g., luxury automobiles; yachts; gems; jewelry; other fashion accessories; cosmetics; perfumes; furs; designer clothing; luxury watches; rugs and tapestries; electronic entertainment software and equipment; recreational sports equipment; tobacco; wine and other alcoholic beverages; musical instruments; art; and antiques and collectible items including but not limited to rare coins and stamps.

OFAC has also imposed additional restrictions; prohibiting States persons are prohibited from registering vessels in North Korea, or from otherwise obtaining authorization for a vessel to fly the North Korean flag.

BIS Proposes Changes for Exporting High-Tech Goods to China

The U.S. Commerce Department has proposed requiring U.S. companies that export high-tech goods to China to verify that their products will not aid China’s military.

David McCormick, under secretary of Commerce, said the proposed rule would achieve two objectives: “supporting American companies in competing in the vast Chinese market for civilian technology while preventing the export of technologies that contribute to China’s military modernization.”

The proposed amendments include a revision to the licensing review policy for items controlled on the Commerce Control List (CCL) for reasons of national security, including a new control based on knowledge of a military end-use on exports to the PRC of certain CCL items that otherwise do not require a license to the PRC. The items subject to this license requirement will be set forth in a list. This rule further proposes to revise the licensing review policy for items controlled for reasons of chemical and biological proliferation, nuclear nonproliferation, and missile technology for export to the PRC, requiring that applications involving such items be reviewed in conjunction with the revised national security licensing policy.

This rule proposes the creation of a new authorization for validated end-users in certain destinations, including the PRC, to whom certain, specified items may be exported or reexported. Such validated end-users would be placed on a list in the EAR after review and approval by the United States Government.

Finally, this rule proposes to require exporters to obtain an End-User Certificate, issued by the PRC Ministry of Commerce, for all items that both require a license to the PRC for any reason and exceed a total value of $5,000. The current PRC End-Use Certificate applies only to items controlled for national security reasons. This rule also proposes to eliminate the current requirement that exporters submit PRC End-User Certificates to BIS with their license applications but provides that they must retain them for five years.

For details, please see the July 7, 2006 notification in the Federal Register. DL Exports provides a service that will automatically send you pertinent export compliance articles from the Federal Register and other Federal Government sites, contact us for more details.

Phase out of ELLIE and D-Trade Training

Beginning October 12, 2006, ELLIE and ROBB will no longer accept electronic DSP-5 forms (for permanent export of defense articles). Industry users will be required to submit all DSP-5 forms through D-Trade. As this deadline approaches, DDTC is making a concerted effort to ensure that industry users have the necessary preparation and tools to submit export applications to D-Trade.

In the weeks leading up to October 12, DDTC will conduct free D-Trade training and usage seminars in the District of Columbia (July 20), New York (August 3), California (August 16), Florida (August 30), and Illinois (September 12) to educate industry representatives on the use and benefits of D-Trade. These seminars will offer all industry users the opportunity to explore the benefits of D-Trade, learn about upcoming D-Trade initiatives, and view a demonstration of the new D-Trade amendment forms. D-Trade experts will be on-hand after each session to answer questions regarding the transition to D-Trade, and to assist attendees in learning how to use the D-Trade system.

For more information on registering for one of these events go to: http://www.pmdtc.org/memorandum.htm.

BIS Announces Significant Change in Computer Ratings

BIS announced on April 24, 2006 to revise the formula for calculating computer performance from Composite Theoretical Performance (CTP) measured in Millions of Theoretical Operations Per Second (MTOPS) to Adjusted Peak Performance (APP) measured in Weighted TeraFLOPS (Trillion Floating point Operations Per Second) (WT). This rule also establishes new control levels in Category 4 of the Commerce Control List (CCL) expressed in WT. In addition, this rule renames License Exception CTP to License Exception APP (Adjusted Peak Performance) to correspond to the new formula. This rule also makes eligibility of License Exception APP.

This rule also moves Bulgaria from Computer Tier 3 to Computer Tier 1, removes High Performance Computer (XP) and Missile Technology (MT) controls from certain Export Control Classification Numbers (ECCNs) in Category 4 of the CCL, and removes the section of the EAR dedicated to various requirements for high performance computers.

Patriot Act Reauthorization Increases in Penalties for EAR and IEEPA Violations

Signing of the Patriot Improvements and Reauthorization Act of 2005 (H.R. 3199) on March 9, 2006 by President Bush, the basic civil penalty for violation of the sanctions under the International Emergency Economic Powers Act (IEEPA), has been raised from $11,000 to $50,000 per violation. Since the lapse of the Export Administration Act, the President extended the authority of BIS to regulate exports under the IEEPA as an emergency measure

In addition the sentence for individuals convicted of willful violations of the law has been increased from a maximum of 10 to a maximum of 20 years in prison. :

Specific wording in the act:

SEC. 402. INCREASED PENALTIES FOR TERRORISM FINANCING.

Section 206 of the International Emergency Economic Powers

Act (50 U.S.C. 1705) is amended—

(1) in subsection (a), by deleting ‘‘$10,000’’ and inserting ‘‘$50,000’’; and

(2) in subsection (b), by deleting ‘‘ten years’’ and inserting ‘‘twenty years’’.

To read the Patriot Act in its entirety: http://frwebgate.access.gpo.gov/cgi-bin/getdoc.cgi?dbname=109_cong_bills&docid=f:h3199enr.pdf

In addition, even more dramatic penalties have been proposed by Rep. Henry Hyde under the Export Administration Renewal Act of 2005 (H.R. 4572) which would increase civil penalties for EAR and IEEPA violations to $500,000.

Eastern Europe Countries Removed from D:1 Country Group

On June 28, 2004, the Bureau of Industry and Security (BIS) published an amendment to the EAR to remove certain regional stability and crime control license requirements to new NATO member countries. Seven countries acceded to NATO on March 29, 2004: Bulgaria, Estonia, Latvia, Lithuania, Romania, Slovakia and Slovenia. This final rule amends the EAR to provide for these newer NATO member states and for three other NATO member states, Hungary, Iceland, and Poland, treatment consistent with all other NATO member states respect to national security license requirements (§ 742.2(a)) and Supplement No. 1 to part 738 (Country Chart)). This final rule also removes Bulgaria, Estonia, Latvia and Lithuania from General Prohibition Eight, which concerns certain in-transit transactions, (§ 736.2(b)(8)), and removes restrictions on License Exceptions related to crime control from Bulgaria, Czech Republic, Estonia, Hungary, Latvia, Poland, Romania, Slovakia, and Slovenia (§ 740.2). This final rules adds Bulgaria, Estonia, Latvia, Lithuania and Romania to Country Group B, and removes them from Country Group D:1 (Supplement No. 1 to part 740). Exports to these countries are now eligible for certain license exceptions set forth in part 740, and the national security licensing policy set forth in §742.2(b) for Country Group D:1 countries no longer applies.

Changes in Iraq Export Policies

On July 30, 2004, the President signed an Executive Order terminating the national emergency declared in Executive Order 12722, revoking it and certain related Executive Orders. Among other things, the termination of the national emergency ends the Department of the Treasury's authority to maintain export controls pursuant to those Executive Orders. By virtue of this action, export licensing jurisdiction reverted from the Department of the Treasury’s Office of Foreign Assets Control (OFAC) to BIS. Also on July 30, 2004, BIS published a rule defining the new licensing policy and requirements for Iraq. The rule is designed to address two significant foreign policy goals with respect to Iraq. In particular, the rule furthers the goal of ensuring that exports and reexports of controlled items destined to civil infrastructure rebuilding do not suffer undue licensing delays. At the same time, in furtherance of applicable UNSC Resolutions and U.S. foreign policy interests, the rule revises section 746.3 of the Export Administration Regulations (15 CFR parts 730-799) (EAR) and retains substantial restrictions on exports to Iraq destined for inappropriate end-users or end-uses. In addition, the rule addresses certain transactions involving the transfer of items subject to the EAR within Iraq.

For more information: http://www.bis.doc.gov/policiesandregulations/IraqSummary.htm#I

Changes in rules for Libya

On November 16, 2005, the Bureau of Industry and Security (BIS), published an amendment to the Export Administration Regulations (EAR) establishing a new license exception to facilitate the export and reexport of certain items subject to the EAR to U.S. persons in Libya. BIS published the amendment specifically to facilitate U.S. persons business activities, including humanitarian activities, in Libya. The new license exception, "U.S. Persons in Libya" (USPL) is found in Section 740.19 of the EAR.

New License Exception USPL authorizes the export and reexport of certain items controlled on the Commerce Control List (CCL) in Part 774 of the EAR for anti-terrorism (AT) reasons only when shipped for the exclusive use of U.S. persons in Libya and their employees, within the scope of their employment. Items exported or reexported under License Exception USPL are intended to facilitate normal business activities, including humanitarian activities. The definition of "U.S. Person" found in part 772 of the EAR applies in the context of new License Exception USPL.

Items exported or reexported to Libya under License Exception USPL must remain under the control and supervision of a U.S. person. They are not eligible for transfer to a non-U.S. person in Libya. Items exported or reexported under License Exception USPL and not destroyed or consumed in the ordinary course of business may be returned to the United States without BIS authorization or reexported to a third country consistent with BIS’s license requirements for such reexports.

For more information: http://www.bis.doc.gov/PoliciesAndRegulations/LibyaGuidance11_16_05.htm

Mandatory AES Reporting for all SEDs Expected by Year-End

The Census Bureau proposed on 2/17/05 to require mandatory filing of export information through the Automated Export System (AES) or through the AESDirect, for all shipments where an SED is currently required. AES is stalled over Homeland Security concerns and will not be implemented until interagency concerns are resolved.

All exporters will need to receive training and be signed up on the AESDirect system. In fact, in order to be authorized to file shipment information through AESDirect a company representative must pass the AESDirect or AESPcLink Certification Quiz. Training sessions are available online, as well as through local organization such as the Mass Export Center.

Additional information can be found on the AESDirect website at: http://www.aesdirect.gov/.

Changes in Deemed Export Controls Proposed

The BIS is reviewing recommendations from the Office of Inspector General which addresses the fact that current controls may not be stopping the transfer of technology to foreign nationals in the US. Interpretations of the current language regarding the “use” of equipment by foreign nationals have led to potential releases of technology, particularly at US academic and research institutions which routinely have used the fundamental research exemption available under the EAR.

Current regulations also are based only on a foreign nationals’ most recent country of permanent residence or citizenship. There is concern that foreign nationals originally from countries of concern are not being scrutinized. The recommendation is that the BIS require companies to apply for a deemed export license for employees & visitors with access to dual-use controlled technology if they were born in a country where the technology transfer would require an export license, regardless of their most recent citizenship or permanent residency.

Changes in the Countries Subject to CBW End-Use/End-User Controls

The BIS has amended the EAR to expand the country scope to any destination worldwide for restrictions on certain chemical and biological weapons (CBW) end-uses for controlled products. Prior to the amendment, the restrictions applied only to countries of concern for CBW reasons (Country Group D:3 in Supp. 1 to part 740 of the EAR). The new rule expands this license requirement to all countries, including those in Country Group A:3 (the Australia Group-participating countries).

Revisions in Export Restrictions to Libya

Prior regulations prohibited the servicing or any other activities involving items originally exported or re-exported to Libya illegally by third parties (referred to as “installed base” items). The BIS has replaced this prohibition with the division of activities into two categories, defined as follows:

  1. Those that require a report to the BIS, but not a license. This includes items subject to the EAR but not on the CCL, items on the CCL that are now authorized for export under a License Exception, and items on the CCL controlled only for NS and AT reasons and not on the Wassenaar Arrangement’s Sensitive or Very Sensitive Lists
  2. Those that require a license. All other activities involving installed base items listed on the CCL.

A general policy of denial applies to Libyan access to 5D002 software. A further amendment removes the general policy of denial for perforators classified under ECCN 1C992, and allows for case-by-case review of these exports.

BIS Expands Licensing Requirements to Entities Sanctioned by the State Department

The BIS has added a new Sec. 744.19 to the EAR stating that it is the BIS’ policy to deny any export/reexport license application if the applicant, other party authorized to receive the license, purchaser, intermediate consignee, ultimate consignee or end-user, is subject to a sanction issued as part of:

  1. the Iran-Iraq Arms Nonproliferation Act of 1992,
  2. the Iran Nonproliferation Act of 2000, or
  3. the Missile Technology Control Act of 1990.

Notices of the imposition of sanctions under these three statutes are published by the State Department in the Federal Register.

Also, new section 744.20 of the EAR provides that the BIS may impose license requirements on entities sanctioned by the State Department for exports of items subject to the EAR. This will be facilitated by adding the State Dept. sanctioned entity to the BIS Entity List, with notations regarding the applicable license requirements, any license exceptions available, and the licensing policy.

March 2005 Revisions to the EAR Due to Changes in the Missile Technology Control Regime (MTCR) Annex

The EAR was updated to reflect the addition of Bulgaria to the MTCR. Therefore, Bulgaria is now added to the Country Group A:2 list in Supp. No. 1 to part 740. In addition, changes were made to several ECCNs, which will result in increased license applications for some of them. Affected ECCNs include: 1C007, 1C107, 1C111, 1C116, 2A001, 2B104, 2B116, 9A106, 9A107, 9B106, and 9B117. This denotes a slight easing of high tech exports to Bulgaria.

Four Syrian Entities Added to the BIS Entity List

Effective March 10, 2005, four Syrian entities were added to the Entity List, which triggers a licensing requirement, and general presumption of denial, to these parties. They include: The Higher Institute of Applied Science and Technology (HIAST), the Industrial Establishment of Defense (IED), National Standards and Calibration Laboratory (NSCL), and the Scientific Studies and Research Center (SSRC). This is the first time that entities from an embargoed country have been added. No exports to Syria are permitted at this time.


DDTC to Review License Application Times

In National Security Presidential Directive--56, Defense Trade Reform, signed January 22, 2008, the Department of State was directed to complete the review and adjudication of license applications within 60 days of receipt, except in cases where national security exceptions apply. The President further directed that these exceptions be published. In accordance with that directive, the Directorate of Defense Trade Controls has implemented procedures to ensure that this 60 day requirement is affected, except when the following the national security exceptions are applicable:
(1) When a Congressional Notification is required: The Arms Export Control Act Section 36(c) and (d) and the International Traffic in Arms Regulations, 22 CFR 123.15, requires a certification be provided to Congress prior to granting any license or other approval for transactions, if it meets the requirements identified for the sale of major defense equipment, manufacture abroad of significant military equipment, defense articles and services, or the re-transfer to other nations. Notification thresholds differ based on the dollar value, countries concerned and defense articles and services.
(2) Required Government Assurances have not been received. These would include, for example, Missile Technology Control Regime Assurances, and Cluster Munitions assurances.
(3) End-use Checks have not been completed. (Commonly referred to as ``Blue Lantern'' checks. End-use checks are key to the U.S. Government's prevention of illegal defense exports and technology transfers, and range from simple contacts to verifying the bona fides of a transaction to physical inspection of an export.)
(4) Department of Defense has notified the Directorate of Defense Trade Controls that an overriding national security exception exists.
(5) Requires a Waiver of Restrictions. (For example, a sanctions waiver.)


BIS reviews Export Controls of High Premium Machine Tools

WASHINGTON, DC – The U.S. Department of Commerce’s Bureau of Industry and Security (BIS) has initiated a systematic industry study of the U.S. 5-axis simultaneous control machine tool industry. These high precision tools, which include mills, grinders, mill/turns, and machining centers, are used extensively in the aerospace, automotive, and shipbuilding industries, and have important national security dimensions. “Assessing this critical industry and ensuring that U.S. export controls are up to date has important ramifications for our economic competitiveness and national security capabilities in high precision manufacturing,” said Under Secretary of Commerce Mancuso. “A vibrant U.S. machine tool industry is critical for our long-term national security interests.”

DL Exports International, Inc.’s first Customer Appreciation Lunch in Newport, RI June 1st

We invited loyal and active clients from 2007 to join us for a beautiful day in Newport Harbor for drinks on the rooftop and lunch at the Mooring. We incorporated this year after 22 years and wanted to say thanks ands propose a break from the stressful schedules we all have. We hope even more people can participate next year!  Click here to see some candid photos of the event.

Increasing Government Focus on Successor Liability:

U.S. government agencies that administer U.S. international trade laws, i.e. BIS, DDTC, Customs, OFAC, are now imposing penalties on companies for past violations of export controls, sanctions and customs regulations committed by businesses they have acquired. The penalties for violations of these laws can represent a significant liability to the acquiring company and may also affect the valuation of the target company.

All companies as a best practice need to review a potential acquisition’s compliance with international trade laws. If you are an export compliance manager, you should be part of the acquisition team to ensure that an export control audit is performed as a component of the due diligence review.

DL Exports works with companies that export dual-use and ITAR-controlled items to evaluate the risks associated with the acquisition of a company. Tools we offer include drafting of due diligence questionnaires and the conduct of export compliance audits.

Several high-profile cases have highlighted the need for companies to focus on successor liability.

  • In March 2001, the BIS charged three related firms (collectively described as Sigma-Aldrich) with more than 300 violations of the Export Administration Regulations (EAR). The charges were based on unlicensed exports of controlled biological toxins to various destinations made by Research Biochemicals Ltd. Partnership (RBLP) before it sold its partnership interests to Sigma-Aldrich. BIS imposed liability against Sigma-Aldrich as both a successor for violations occurring before the transfer of interest, and as the actual wrongdoer for violations occurring after the transfer. Sigma-Aldrich agreed in October 2002 to pay $1.76 million to settle the case.
  • In December 2002, the Boeing Company was charged with ITAR violations involving the launch of satellites from the People’s Republic of China which occurred at Hughes Space and Communications, a company purchased by Boeing in January 2000. In March 2003, Boeing and Hughes settled these charges for $32 million.